Feature Comparison
| Feature | askSOPia | Glean |
|---|---|---|
| AI-powered search and answers | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic knowledge extraction | ✓ | ✕ |
| Structured knowledge cards | ✓ | ✕ |
| Source references with answers | ✓ | ✓ |
| EU data residency | ✓ | ✕ |
| GDPR-compliant processing | ✓ | partial |
| Integration with existing tools | partial | ✓ |
| Suitable for mid-market (20-200 employees) | ✓ | ✕ |
Glean: Great for Corporations, Too Big for Mid-Market
Glean has redefined enterprise search. AI-powered search across all company systems is impressive. Integrations with Google Workspace, Slack, Salesforce, Jira — Glean searches everything and delivers AI-generated answers.
For a Fortune 500 company with 10,000 employees, Glean is an excellent solution. For an engineering firm with 80 employees, it's the wrong choice. For three reasons.
Reason 1: Enterprise Pricing Model
Glean targets enterprise customers. Minimum volumes from 500 users, enterprise sales process with multi-month evaluation, custom pricing negotiations. For a mid-market company with 50-200 employees, this is neither economical nor practical.
askSOPia offers transparent flat-rate pricing. No per-user model. No enterprise sales process.
Reason 2: No EU Data Residency
Glean processes and stores data in US cloud infrastructure. For European companies feeding customer data, project information, and internal knowledge into the system, this is a GDPR risk.
askSOPia: All data in Azure data centers in Germany and the Netherlands. No data leaves the EU.
Reason 3: Search vs. Knowledge Management
Glean is primarily a search engine — a very good one, but still a search engine. It finds information stored in existing systems. It does not extract new knowledge.
askSOPia goes a step further: It extracts knowledge from meetings, conversations, and documents and creates structured knowledge cards. Decision Cards, Process Cards, Knowledge Cards — with context, connections, and source references.
The difference: Glean finds what has already been written. askSOPia captures what would never have been written.
What askSOPia Does Better
Knowledge Extraction Instead of Just Search
askSOPia transcribes meetings, analyzes the content, and automatically extracts decisions, processes, and expertise. This is not a Glean feature — Glean searches existing content but does not create new knowledge structures.
Structured Knowledge Instead of Search Results
Glean delivers search results: links to documents and pages. askSOPia delivers structured knowledge: cards with type, context, and connections. This makes a decisive difference for onboarding, knowledge transfer, and decision traceability.
Built for Mid-Market
askSOPia was designed for companies with 20-200 employees. The pricing model, onboarding, and support — everything is tailored for mid-market companies. No enterprise sales cycle. No 6-month implementation project.
What Glean Does Better
Honesty matters: Glean has strengths that askSOPia does not.
More extensive integrations: Glean connects with dozens of enterprise systems. askSOPia focuses on meeting recordings, documents, and direct knowledge extraction.
Broader search: Glean searches emails, chat messages, code repositories, and CRM systems simultaneously. askSOPia searches its own knowledge library.
Enterprise features: Single sign-on, granular permissions, compliance dashboards — Glean has the full enterprise package.
Who askSOPia Is the Better Choice For
- Companies with 20-200 employees
- Companies that need EU data residency (not want — need)
- Companies that want to actively secure knowledge, not just find it
- Companies that want transparent flat-rate pricing instead of enterprise-scale budgets
Step 1: Executive Continuity Review (free, 20 min.) Step 2: Knowledge Sprint (5 days) Step 3: askSOPia Subscription (flat rate, independent of user count)
Frequently Asked Questions
Next Step
Ready to Secure Your Knowledge?
Less than the cost of a bad first month of a mis-hire.
20 minutes. No slides. No prep needed.